The prime minister’s background as a tough backroom operator has served him well, but internal Labor critics accuse him of turning a deaf ear to advice at crucial moments. What the voters say on 3 May will define his legacy
- Polls tracker; election guide; full federal election coverage
- Anywhere but Canberra; interactive electorates guide
- Listen to the first episode of our new narrative podcast series: Gina
- Get our afternoon election email, free app or daily news podcast
It was a little after noon and Malcolm Turnbull’s government was collapsing under a second leadership challenge in as many days from Peter Dutton. After a string of ministerial resignations and frantic Liberal number-crunching, the House of Representatives had just been adjourned for the day. So heightened was the civic emergency in Parliament House on 23 August 2018 – a few hours of Hunter S Thompson-esque treachery and weirdness – that government wheels effectively halted as the nation contemplated Turnbull’s demise and the next day’s rise of Dutton, Scott Morrison or Julie Bishop.
The cause-and-effect nature of leadership challenges draws most senior politicians into the helter-skelter, sliding-door liminality of it. Anthony Albanese was no stranger to the treachery and arithmetic of leadership familicide after the epic Rudd-Gillard-Rudd death roll that culminated in Labor’s 2013 election defeat. So it might reasonably be assumed he was glued to the rolling coverage or intimately involved in war-gaming tactical options for whoever would emerge as the next Liberal prime minister.
